 |
 |
 |
The minutes of the December 10, 2002 meeting were approved as posted to the mailing list.
IESG
The IAB was asked to read and comment on the draft charter for the IESG
and on the draft IESG procedures document.
RFC Editor
Joyce noted that an issue with RSVP number assignment had been
raised with the IESG.
IRTF
No Report.
ISOC
Lynn reported that the Public Interest Registry launched in January.
She also noted that ISOC is now at break even in its finances; a full
report will be made available when ISOC closes its books for 2002.
ITU-T
ITU liaison statements on geographic distribution enum.arpa have
been received. IETF/ITU subgroup is working on a response.
W3C
No Report.
ICANN
The IAB considered whether the BoT member appointed by the IETF should
be a member of the IAB, either ex officio or by limiting the selection
to those serving on the IAB. The IAB decided that this role need not
be ex officio part of the IAB nor should the selection be limited to
members of the IAB. Further discussion of the criteria will be
made public during the call for nominations. This situation will
be reviewed after one year.
The IAB also noted that ICANN is proposing an ENUM workshop. Some concerns were expressed with the interaction of this process with those already in place in the IETF and in the process documents agreed to be the IAB and ITU. Leslie will draft a statement expressing the sense of the meeting for the review of the IAB and eventual transmission to ICANN.
RSSAC
RSSAC has scheduled a meeting for the Sunday prior to the next IETF.
In order to ensure that the IAB liaison can attend, the IAB will
schedule its meeting for Tuesday evening.
IETF Nominations Committee
The NomCom chair currently plans to release all request for approval
together, at or near the end of January.
ISO
The IAB reaffirmed that it would accept the category A liaison originally
proposed by ISO and that a category C liaison would not match the IAB's
sense of the needs of the ISO/IETF relationship.
This agenda item was discussed during the IAB Action agenda topic; see below.
The FCC has asked for _ex parte_ comments on the application. The IAB agreed that any statement should come from ISOC, not the IAB, but that IAB members might provide technical input if the area fell within their technical expertise. Lynn will provide information on when the comments are due.
The IAB considered draft text for a response to ICANN and agreed review by the IESG would be valuable before it was sent to ICANN. The IAB also agreed that a second, more general document on the the topic of IDN deployment strategies would be useful. The structure of this document depends to some extent on whether the RFCs describing IDNA are available. These are now awaiting IANA action. Harald will talk to the relevant ADs about whether this action and these documents should be fast-tracked in the RFC publication process.
After the IETF Chair and Liaisons left the meeting, the topic of the appeal against the decision to approve draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt was discussed. A decision was not reached during this discussion, and further discussion was moved to the appeal-specific mailing list. One or more additional teleconference may also be scheduled to accommodate this discussion.
These minutes were prepared byTed Hardie; comments should be sent to iab-execd@iab.org. An online copy of these and other minutes is available at: http://www.iab.org/documents/IABmins/
The IAB Web page is at http://www.iab.org
|
Index of IAB Meeting Minutes |
|