Minutes
IAB Teleconference
13 May 2003, 4:00 pm - 6:00 pm US EST
ATTENDING
Leslie Daigle -- IAB Chair
Bernard Aboba
Harald Alvestrand -- IETF/IESG Chair
Rob Austein
Patrik Fältström
Sally Floyd
Jun-ichiro Itojun Hagino
Mark Handley
Geoff Huston
Charlie Kaufman
James Kempf
Eric Rescorla
Mike St. Johns
Bert Wijnen -- Liaison from the IESG
Vern Paxson -- IRTF Chair
Joyce Reynolds -- Liaison from the RFC Editor
APOLOGIES
Lynn St. Amour -- Liaison from ISOC
NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING
Tuesday, 10 June 2003, 4:00 EST.
AGENDA
- Rollcall, Agenda Bash and Previous Minutes
- Review of Action Items
- Review of Documents
- IAB Liaison Reports
- Updates from IETF Liaisons
- Proposal: Process for relationships with
non-international bodies
- IAB plans for Vienna IETF meeting
- Review of recent and planned IAB activities
- Other Business
NOTES
0. Rollcall, Agenda Bash and Previous Minutes
1. Review of Action Items
2. Review of Documents
3. IAB Liaison Reports
IESG
The IESG liaison to the IAB is Bert Wijnen.
An experiment has commenced in the area of provision of RT (a ticketing
system) support to any WG that wants it. Levels of interest in this activity
are being assessed.
The IESG is also reviewing aspects of the WG decision making process
in the area of means of resolving potential deadlock situations.
IRTF
The IRTF chair reported receiving a number of concerns and
complaints about the state of ASRG, and is looking into modifying
the RG management to address them.
RFC Editor
"Do Not Publish" (DNP)
There has recently been a discussion between the IESG and RFC
Editor on the issue of when to publish documents as RFCs that
have been rejected by working groups. There is a concern that
document authors will take rejected drafts from the working
groups and submit them directly to the RFC Editor as individual
submissions. A question has arisen whether these documents
should be published before the working group publishes its
output.
The RFC Editor has proposed to the IESG that the IESG may
request that publication of an individual submission may be
delayed by six months by sending RFC Editor a "Do Not Publish"
(DNP) note containing a description of the risks posed by the
document. (The RFC Editor would like to understand the
specifics of the request.)
The author will receive a note including the IESG DNP message
and an explanation that the draft may be resubmitted in six
months. The RFC Editor feels that a timed delay is important
since some working groups do not complete their work. When the
draft is re-submitted, the IESG may request one additional six
month delay if there is sufficient reason to believe the
working group will deliver it's output in that time.
This discussion is still in progress.
-
The IESG's I-D nits document
The IESG is reviewing the I-D nits document. The IESG requested
that the RFC Editor provide a review and feedback. Bert Wijnen has
been sorting the nits into three categories:
- "clerical" nits which will result in a wg draft being rejected before AD review.
E.g., missing security considerations.
- Nits which the AD review should flag and reject before IESG review.
- Nits which can be resolved somewhat painlessly by the RFC Editor
(e.g., excessive line length in body text).
The RFC Editor conveyed to Bert Wijnen that it is willing and able to
handle all the formatting and editorial nits. The RFC Editor
doe not feel that documents should be held up overly long for
reasons of formatting, especially since the RFC Editor will be
fixing the formatting, anyway. The RFC Editor agrees that the
best thing for all involved is to ensure that the semantic nits
(e.g., abstract, normative/informative references, security
considerations, etc.) are best addressed early on to ensure
accurate review and group consensus.
The RFC Editor also agrees that it is reasonable to require
splitting references between normative and informative on all
IESG-reviewed Informational documents.
In all cases, WG chairs and authors will be expected to have
their documents nit-free before submission. The objective of
this activity is to decide when to bounce a document that fails
a nit check. The desire is to set a fairly high bar with the
WG chairs to improve the quality of documents hitting the IESG.
-
New RFC Series/Category and Documented Appeals Process for DNPs
The RFC Editor is currently discussing with the IESG the possibility
of a new series/category for working group Informational documents
such as requirements, architecture, and framework documents, and a
documented appeals process for DNPs.
ISOC
ISOC has been following up on Item # 8 from the IAB Meetings during
the March 2003 IETF concerning the US Homeland Security Office activities
Meetings have taken place with representative of this office, as well
as comparable meetings with officials within Europe.
4. Updates from IETF Liaisons
RSSAC
The RSSAC has been discussing "glue" RRset maintenance and policy issues
(mostly about how active a role ICANN should play about making sure that
the glue RRset stays in sync with the authoritative RRset in the
child zone. The questions include: how much checking should
be undertaken?, Should there be tracking of changes to the authoritative
RRset that the child zone
admin hasn't directly reported to ICANN?
5. Proposal: Process for relationships with non-international bodies
The IAB considered a proposal relating to the manner of interaction with non-international bodies.
The IAB noted that while this was a functional "liaison role", there was some consideration
relating a "liaison" to a degree of perception of some level of peer status between liaising
bodies, and the potential for further liaisons in a wide spectrum of various national and regional
activities. Further consideration of this topic is to be scheduled for the next IAB meeting.
6. IAB plans for Vienna IETF meeting
The IAB decided to invite the CEO of ICANN to meet with the IAB on Thursday of the IETF week.
The IAB considered a proposal to hold an open meeting to undertake enumeration of the class
of operational scenarios for which there is perceived to be a role for scoped, or otherwise
constrained address architectures. At this stage the proposed outputs from this activity are
intended to be an enumeration of the issues raised in the open meeting, followed by a subsequent
architectural analysis of these issues as a means of assisting the IETF to progress with the topic
of various forms of constrained address architecture proposals.
7. Review of recent and planned IAB activities
The mid-month IAB action item review has not been effective, and this will not be continued. The
mid-month informal telechats were considered to be effective, and further calls will be scheduled using
a SIP-based conferencing system.
IAB members were requested to provide periodic summaries of the current status and major issues being faced by those working groups in which they were actively tracking.
8. Other Business
ACTIONS and DOCUMENTS
Actions
- Notification Mechanisms
Leslie Daigle, Ted Hardie, James Kempf
[Dec-02]
current
Status: James Kempf to draft a note on the topic of architectural issues relating to notification mechanisms. Lisa Dusseault to assist.
- James to review and revise initial draft provided by Lisa
- IETF Protocol Parameter Registration
Leslie Daigle, Harald Alvestrand
[Feb-03]
current
Status: Followup actions after meeting with US DoC
- DNS and IDN Document
Rob Austein, Patrik Faltstrom
[Feb-03]
current
Status: Coordinate IETF document between Ads and WGs
- Revise as per drafted introduction and framework
- IAB Workshops
All
[Mar-03]
current
Status: Revisit workshops, and reconsider this along the lines of approach, topic, and logistics.
- DOS attack workshop (below).
- Other topics/approaches to consider?
- IAB input to Security Architecture
James Kempf, Charlie Kaufman
[Mar-03]
current
Status: Generate a survey for the WG chairs to come up with a classification matrix to identify particular issues relating to the interaction of their WG activities and security considerations
- Prepare classification matrix
- IAB Workshop on DOS Attacks
Mark Handley
[Mar-03]
current
Status: Initial scoping activity: a taxonomy paper on the various forms of attack. Also look at the role of a workshop and the potential players.
- Taxonomy document being prepared
- Address Architecture
Leslie Daigle
[May-03]
current
Status: Circulate Harald's formulation of the constrained address architecture issue to the IAB
- WG Status
All
[May-03]
current
Status: Provide the IAB with periodic summaries of the current status of those working groups that they actively follow.
Closed Actions
- Response to ICANN VGRS proposal
Geoff Huston
[Feb-03]
closed
Status: Draft response to ICANN referencing IETF role and document preparation
- ICANN CRADA report
Geoff Huston
[Apr-03]
closed
Status: Note to ICANN from the IAB (as TLG) indicating that the IAB understands
that a CRADA report on the root nameservers has been prepared, and that
the IAB is under the impression that there is a substantive component
of the report devoted to technical aspects of this activity. The IAB is
willing to undertake a technical review of this report if so desired by
ICANN under the terms of the activities encompassed by the technical liaison
activity with ICANN
- IAB Conf calls using SIP
Geoff Huston
[Apr-03]
closed
Status: Get in touch with the SIP gateway provider to see if IAB requirements can be met for a trial call in May
- HSSP
Mike St Johns
[Apr-03]
closed
Status: Contact Ran to followup on briefing proposal.
- HSSP
Leslie Daigle
[Apr-03]
closed
Status: Contact HSSP chair and nominate a member / observer to the Panel Steering Committee
- Ran Aktinson has been nominated as an IETF Liaison
- Global Grid Forum Liaison
Geoff Huston
[Apr-03]
closed
Status: Contact GGF chair and discuss potential liaison arrangements
- proposed liaison arrangements
- V6 Address Architecture
Patrik Faltstrom
[Apr-03]
closed
Status: Draft a note asking the RIRs what amount of consideration has taken place with respect to the PA / PI space issues with respect to IPv6
Documents
- Security considerations, including common security attacks
draft-iab-sec-cons-03.txt
Eric Rescorla
[May-01]
current
Status: RFC Editor (submitted 13-Feb - Author 48 hours)
- Security Mechanisms for the Internet
draft-iab-secmech-02.txt
Charlie Kaufman, Steve Bellovin
[May-01]
current
Status: Revising
- (current) draft published
- (next) incorporate comment into final draft
- A survey of Authentication Mechanisms
draft-iab-auth-mech-00.txt
Eric Rescorla
[Apr-02]
current
Status: Editing
- (current) Complete template section
- (next) IETF call for input
- Internet Architecture and End-to-End
draft-iab-e2e-futures-02.txt
James Kempf, Rob Austein
[Jul-02]
current
Status: Editing
- (current) send pointer to the draft to the e2e interest
list
- Report of IAB Network Management Workshop
draft-iab-nm-workshop-02.txt
Rob Austein
[Oct-02]
current
Status: RFC Editor - submitted 16 April
- Internationalized Resource Identifiers
draft-iab-char-rep-00.txt
Leslie Daigle
[Nov-02]
current
Status: Drafting
- (current) Leslie to review the draft
- Service Identification in packets
draft-iab-service-considerations-00.txt
Mike St Johns, Geoff Huston
[Nov-02]
current
Status: Editing
- (current) draft published
- (next) revise as per comment received
- Transport Controls for VOIP
Sally Floyd, James Kempf
[Nov-02]
current
Status: Drafting
- (current) Document the use of transport control and
congestion detection and avoidance for VOIP applications
- (next) Sally - drafting
- IANA Definition
draft-iab-iana-01.txt
Geoff Huston
[Nov-02]
current
Status: Editing
- (current) IAB review of -02 draft
- (next) publish 02 draft
- ISOC Trustee Appointment Process
draft-iab-isocbot-00.txt
Leslie Daigle
[Nov-02]
current
Status: Editing
- (current) review and revise following completion of
2003 election process
- IAB Research Agenda
Sally Floyd, Vern Paxson, Ran Atkinson, Mike St Johns, John Crowcroft
[Jul-02]
current
Status: Editing
- (current) Document the need for funding for further
research for the Internet, including documenting important topics
for research.
- (next) The document under development covers the need for
research in general and identifies specific areas of research.
- (next) Sally - feedback appreciated - there are as yet unwritten
sections and assistance will be coopted
- (next) Bernard - wireless research is underfunded - will
send mail
- (next) Sally - there is a commented out section referencing
Rob on DNS
- (next) Patrik to write section on issues around address
scoping and related routing and application interactions
- IAB Overview
http://www.iab.org/connexions.html
All
[Mar-03]
current
Status: IAB review - proposed updates requested
- (current) active
- IAB Considerations on Discovery Mechanisms and IPv6
Bernard Aboba, James Kempf
[Mar-03]
current
Status: drafting
- (current) circulate to IAB of a draft indicating progress
to date with this document
- IAB Research Agenda - Operational Areas
Geoff Huston, Rob Austein, James Kempf
[May-03]
current
Status: drafting
- (current) Document the need for funding for
further research for the Internet, including documenting important
topics for research relating to operational activities
- (next) Document focusing on operational concerns.
These minutes were prepared by Geoff Huston; comments should be sent to iab-execd@iab.org.
An online copy of these and other minutes is available at: http://www.iab.org/documents/IABmins/
The IAB Web page is at http://www.iab.org
This page is maintained
by the IAB Executive Director for the IAB.