Internet Architecture Board

RFC2850

Conflict of Interest Policy

Home»Conflict of Interest Policy

Internet Architecture Board Conflict of Interest Policy

This policy covers the nomcom-selected Internet Architecture Board (IAB) members and ex-officio members (collectively, “Covered Individuals”). This policy has no impact on any other participants in IAB activities, for instance liaisons to and from the IAB or IAB program members.

In carrying out their IAB role, Covered Individuals are expected to act in the best interest of the Internet community. Occasionally the duties of this role may be—or may appear to be—incompatible or in conflict with a Covered Individual’s personal interests (including interests of their family members), or the interests of an organization of which the Covered Individual is an employee, director, owner, or otherwise has business or other current or future financial interest.

The purpose of this policy is to prevent Covered Individuals from using the IAB’s resources or decisions as a means for gain for themselves or related third parties.

Topics Requiring Disclosure Consideration

The IAB does not directly deal with matters relating to contracts or finance. The IAB does, however, have a role in personnel decisions, and its decisions and outputs have a potential to indirectly affect contracts within the IETF system. The IAB’s technical decisions and outputs also have a potential to impact both work elsewhere in the IETF and businesses that employ or develop Internet technology.

Activity on the IAB involves discussion and decisions regarding technical matters, mainly related to IETF activities. As an activity adjacent to a standardization process, it is often the case that Covered Individuals will have some (frequently non-financial) stake in the outcome of discussions or decisions that relate to technical matters. Covered Individuals should exercise judgement regarding disclosure related to technical matters, erring on the side of transparency. It is not expected that recusal related to technical matters will be common.

Topics where disclosure of potential conflicts may be required include, but is not limited to:

  1. Confirmations of candidates selected by other bodies
  2. Standards appeals
  3. The RFC Series Editor
  4. Liaison roles
  5. Advice to ISOC
  6. Appointments to other bodies

Sources of Potential Conflicts

This policy documents the expectation that all Covered Individuals publicly disclose, to the best of their ability, their main employment, sponsorship, consulting customer, or other relevant sources of income when entering the IAB or whenever there are updates.

Covered Individuals should promptly disclose when a topic discussed by the IAB could be considered a conflict of interest by a reasonable person.

Specific circumstances that might cause a conflict of interest include (but are not limited to):

  • A personnel decision relates to the Covered Individual, a colleague that the Covered Individual’s works closely with, or a family member. For the purposes of this policy, a “person working closely with” is someone working in the same team or project, or a direct manager or employee of the Covered Individual. And “family” means a spouse, domestic partner, child, sibling, parent, stepchild, stepparent, and mother-, father-, son-, daughter-, brother-, or sister-in-law, and any other person living in the same household, except tenants and household employees.
  • A decision or output from the IAB that may impact a contract that the IETF enters into with a party, and that party relates to the Covered Individual, a colleague that the Covered Individual works closely with, or a family member.
  • The success of a Covered Individual’s business depends significantly on the outcome of an IAB discussion or decision.

Disclosure and Recusal Procedure

Aside from general employment and relevant income public disclosures required above, any Covered Individual’s other potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed internally to the IAB. Covered Individuals may choose to recuse themselves from participation in discussions or decisions at their discretion. The IAB can request that a Covered Individual who discloses a conflict of interest recuse themselves from discussions and decisions.

Recusal is expected to be rare, in part because the IETF nomination committee (nomcom) is expected to provide the IAB with a diverse set of members to balance the different priorities and opinions of individual members.

Recusal Transparency

When a Covered Individual recuses from a decision or discussion, it will be noted in the public IAB minutes.

Current Disclosures

IAB Member Main Employment, Sponsorship, or Consulting Customer Other relevant activities, sources of income, or potential conflict of interest Disclosure Date
Jari Arkko Ericsson None 2021-04-25
Deborah Brungard AT&T None 2021-04-20
Ben Campbell Independent Consultant; CTIA, Akayla
  • Sole proprietor of Standard Velocity Consulting, LLC
  • Participant in ATIS
  • Participant in GSMA
2021-04-24
Lars Eggert NetApp
  • IEEE
    • Standards development organization, non-profit research, education, and advocacy organization
    • IEEE Internet Award Selection Committee Member
  • NWO IN-SIGHT.IT
    • Academic Research Project
    • Valorization Board Member
  • EU H2020 NGI Pointer
    • Academic Research Project
    • Advisory Board Member
  • Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)
    • Non-profit research, education, and advocacy organization
    • Steering Group Member, Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) Selection Committee Member
  • Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
    • Standards development organization
    • Chair, Architecture Board Member, Steering Group Member, Working Group Chair
  • IETF Administration LLC, Board Member
2021-04-20, updated 2021-07-01, 2021-07-15
Wesley Hardaker University of Southern California’s Information Sciences Institute
  • Owner: Captured on earth photography
  • Principal manager of the b.root-servers.net service
  • Representative for b.root-servers.net to ICANN/RSSAC
  • Founder and lead for the Net-SNMP open source project
  • Founder and lead for the DNSSEC-Tools open source project
2021-04-24
Cullen Jennings Cisco Advisory Committee Representative at W3C 2021-04-25
Mirja Kühlewind Ericsson None 2021-04-20
Zhenbin Li Huawei Technologies, Co., Ltd. None 2021-04-28
Jared Mauch Akamai Technologies
  • Owner,  Washtenaw Fiber Properties LLC
  • Trustee, Educational Foundation of Dexter
  • Detroit Internet Exchange
2021-04-27
Thomas Pauly Apple None 2021-04-19
David Schinazi Google LLC None 2021-04-21
Colin Perkins University of Glasgow
  • EU H2020 DAPSI
    Advisory Board member
  • IRTF Chair
  • ACM/IRTF Applied Networking Research Workshop Steering committee member
  • Research Group Funding from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (grants EP/R04144X/1 and EP/S036075/1) and from Rakuten Mobile.
  • Occasional consulting work for the UK Government relating to Internet standards and development.
2021-04-28
Russ White Juniper Networks None 2021-04-21
Jiankang Yao China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) None 2021-04-21

 


This policy was approved 2020-03-04.